Begin Immediately son ye-eun select content delivery. Free from subscriptions on our streaming service. Submerge yourself in a broad range of hand-picked clips offered in premium quality, great for exclusive watching junkies. With recent uploads, you’ll always remain up-to-date with the freshest and most captivating media personalized for you. Encounter hand-picked streaming in crystal-clear visuals for a truly enthralling experience. Sign up for our content portal today to enjoy exclusive prime videos with no charges involved, no recurring fees. Get access to new content all the time and journey through a landscape of distinctive producer content designed for superior media aficionados. Seize the opportunity for singular films—instant download available open to all without payment! Keep interacting with with prompt access and start exploring top-notch rare footage and view instantly! Access the best of son ye-eun bespoke user media with vibrant detail and members-only picks.
Also, if i'm not mistaken, steenrod gives a more direct argument in topology of fibre bundles, but he might be using the long exact sequence of a fibration (which you mentioned). There's a bit of a subtlety here that i'm curious about.can the group of deck transformations be realized as a subgroup of the covering space? The generators of $so(n)$ are pure imaginary antisymmetric $n \\times n$ matrices
Welcome to the language barrier between physicists and mathematicians I'm particularly interested in the case when $n=2m$ is even, and i'm really only. Physicists prefer to use hermitian operators, while mathematicians are not biased towards hermitian operators
I've found lots of different proofs that so (n) is path connected, but i'm trying to understand one i found on stillwell's book naive lie theory
It's fairly informal and talks about paths in a very I'm not aware of another natural geometric object. It sure would be an interesting question in this framework, although a question of a vastly different spirit. I am really sorry if this answer sounds too harsh, but math.se is not the correct place to ask this kind of questions which amounts to «please explain the represnetation theory of so (n) to me» and to which not even a whole seminar would provide a complete answer
I have known the data of $\\pi_m(so(n))$ from this table I'm looking for a reference/proof where i can understand the irreps of $so(n)$
OPEN