Open Now subhashree sahu all videos deluxe streaming. No subscription fees on our on-demand platform. Become absorbed in in a vast collection of chosen content demonstrated in HD quality, excellent for select viewing lovers. With contemporary content, you’ll always be in the know with the most recent and compelling media personalized to your tastes. Experience organized streaming in fantastic resolution for a deeply engaging spectacle. Become a part of our video library today to check out VIP high-quality content with at no cost, no recurring fees. Look forward to constant updates and venture into a collection of special maker videos produced for first-class media junkies. You have to watch original media—download fast now available to everybody at no cost! Be a part of with immediate access and delve into prime unique content and begin viewing right away! Discover the top selections of subhashree sahu all videos singular artist creations with brilliant quality and members-only picks.
11 there are multiple ways of writing out a given complex number, or a number in general And while $1$ to a large power is 1, a number very close to 1 to a large power can be anything. The complex numbers are a field
There are infinitely many possible values for $1^i$, corresponding to different branches of the complex logarithm The reason why $1^\infty$ is indeterminate, is because what it really means intuitively is an approximation of the type $ (\sim 1)^ {\rm large \, number}$ The confusing point here is that the formula $1^x = 1$ is not part of the definition of complex exponentiation, although it is an immediate consequence of the definition of natural number exponentiation.
It's a fundamental formula not only in arithmetic but also in the whole of math
Is there a proof for it or is it just assumed? 49 actually 1 was considered a prime number until the beginning of 20th century Unique factorization was a driving force beneath its changing of status, since it's formulation is quickier if 1 is not considered a prime But i think that group theory was the other force.
How do i convince someone that $1+1=2$ may not necessarily be true I once read that some mathematicians provided a very length proof of $1+1=2$ Can you think of some way to Intending on marking as accepted, because i'm no mathematician and this response makes sense to a commoner
However, i'm still curious why there is 1 way to permute 0 things, instead of 0 ways.
注1：【】代表软件中的功能文字 注2：同一台电脑，只需要设置一次，以后都可以直接使用 注3：如果觉得原先设置的格式不是自己想要的，可以继续点击【多级列表】——【定义新多级列表】，找到相应的位置进行修改
OPEN
