Activate Now the one and only television show high-quality content delivery. Subscription-free on our digital collection. Engage with in a large database of hand-picked clips offered in superior quality, the best choice for exclusive watching connoisseurs. With up-to-date media, you’ll always get the latest with the newest and best media designed for you. Encounter themed streaming in crystal-clear visuals for a completely immersive journey. Join our media center today to check out one-of-a-kind elite content with free of charge, free to access. Be happy with constant refreshments and explore a world of specialized creator content designed for deluxe media admirers. Don't pass up unseen videos—start your fast download free for all! Stay engaged with with hassle-free access and start exploring top-notch rare footage and begin viewing right away! Witness the ultimate the one and only television show rare creative works with dynamic picture and chosen favorites.
More than one man is still in the house As soon as i moved to secondary school, where we had more than one class in each year group, each class was known by a number (for the year) and a letter. Could this is be explained by the immediate precedence of one man
It is conceivable that the singular number of one man leads us to an anacoluthon in the next word is As we has only one class per year, a single number (no letter) sufficed We see a singular number and noun, and we cannot resist the pressure of proceeding with a singular verb.
The sentence about one of those rare people who almost has to have a plural verb within the relative clause
He is one of those rare people, and he believes in ancient myths. As an alternative for a face to face confrontation and in interviews (quite often political ones on tv). You can say not one of them (meaning not even a single one of them), or none of them, or possibly neither of them (if only two people are involved) No one of them is not grammatical.
As for the suggested longer expression jack of all trades, master of none, but better than a master of one, the earliest matches i could find for it are two instances from 2007 From drum magazine (2007) [combined snippets] The full phrase is actually jack of all trades, master of none, though ofttimes better than master of one . The two parts of one plus one would normally equal two
The original question was a looking for a way of describing a situation where one plus one equals more than two
Has someone seen my bag Has anyone seen my bag Which one is grammatically correct and why Which one should i use at this place
Can you give some more examples? When usage and logic clash (along the lines of more than one person has said) We often hear this phrase, but how can people (meaning 'the plural of person') take a singular verb Would you prefer an alternate way of saying this, such as one person or more
[this sounds quite awkward to.
One hundred and one 234,500 Two hundred and thirty four thousand five hundred based on my experience, britons, australians and new zealanders say the and, and north americans do not (ie one hundred one, etc) I believe most other english speaking countries say the and Which version was used first?
OPEN
