image image image image image image image
image

Experience Is The Only Source Of Knowledge Creator-Made Video Media #684

40787 + 328 OPEN

Begin Immediately experience is the only source of knowledge deluxe webcast. Complimentary access on our media source. Plunge into in a enormous collection of organized videos displayed in crystal-clear picture, a must-have for first-class viewing fans. With trending videos, you’ll always be informed with the latest and greatest media customized for you. Experience arranged streaming in stunning resolution for a truly engrossing experience. Become a part of our content portal today to access special deluxe content with free of charge, access without subscription. Experience new uploads regularly and journey through a landscape of unique creator content tailored for top-tier media junkies. Don't forget to get specialist clips—start your fast download free for all! Stay tuned to with hassle-free access and get into superior one-of-a-kind media and get started watching now! Get the premium experience of experience is the only source of knowledge uncommon filmmaker media with brilliant quality and exclusive picks.

Hey everyone, im trying to explain to a friend of mine the difference between having experience in/of/with and to tell you the truth think ive done more damage than good with my rambling explanations so heres hoping we can get some collective explanations on the subject 1) work experience or working. I have a lot of.

From my experience is possible, but not common (at least in be) i have two questions For example, if you look at the british national corpus, you find 19 examples, compared with 194 for in my experience

In the us corpus (coca) there is a similar pattern

165 from compared with 750 in (judging) from my experience, it is true. When you say an experience, you are referring to a single experience, like i had an interesting experience while i was in italy. but when you are referring to experience that you acquired while working on a job, you refer to it as experience collectively Strong just isn't a word used to describe experience.

I agree sophie, 'experience in' often relates to an activity in which it is possible to become proficient or specialise Where different degrees of experience can be gained 'experience of' is broader and relates to one's exposure to something (a place, activity, emotion, etc) However i feel that (a) is of course correct, but (b) is possibly incorrect (it anyway jars slightly), unless it is.

Cambridge doesn't give an example of 'experience with', but it does give one for 'experience in'

Experience in sth their experience in marketing and promotion has brought excellent results Which is pretty similar to oxford's example I had some experience in fashion design. I have experience working with (no of)

The coca (ae corpus) has many examples of have experience of + gerund So we will use our expertise to try to push the boundaries of what can be reported I was helping my friend complete the first sentence of his summary in his resume and came. You can say wide experience, which is why you get google hits, but it doesn't match this context

Wide experience is used when talking about a variety of experience, whereas vast/extensive are used when talking about a lot of experience

Since the sentence doesn't indicate any kind of range of different experiences, wide doesn't fit, whereas vast and extensive do. Is experience used correctly in the above two sentences I would appreciate your answers There are two types of that clauses

OPEN